continuity.
The lack of chapters is a clever method adopted by Solzhenitsyn
that reflets the seemingly never ending and relentless sentence
the zeks were sentenced too. The reader sympathizes with the
zeks as he two is locked within the book, unable to break, as
there seems to be no break in the prose.
The end of chapters are conventional points for the reader to
stop at and the lack of chapters handicaps the reader into
reading on. The reader, similar to the zeks, hasfreedom taken
away from himself/herself, in the form that they have to read
on.
The reader than feels easier to sympathize, or if you detest
reading, empathize with the zeks which are put on a strict
schedule, are stolen of their freedoms and our serving a endless
sentence.
monotony.
The simple authorship is combined with the lack of chapters in
this book to provide a sense of monotony throughout the novel. The book has no evident climax or buildup. There was nothing notably amazing about the plot of the book and there is no point at which the book seems like an ideal candidate for a blockbuster movie. However the humdrum tone of the novel colligates with the feel of the prison sentence, thus allowing, like the aspect of continuity, the reader to sympathize with the zeks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your favourite book?
links.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(35)
-
▼
April
(13)
- CHARACTER STUDY: MEURSAULT
- Important Quotes [PART 2]
- Narrative Style&Linguistic Features
- English translation & Significance of the title
- Themes
- existentialism.
- Symbols and Motifs
- Absurdity
- Important Quotes [PART 1]
- the outsider introduction.
- the reason why Solzhenitsyn chose a good day.
- continuity and monotony.
- trailer II : russian rap edition.
-
▼
April
(13)
No comments:
Post a Comment